N.J.S.A. 17B:26-2.5

Third surgical opinion

17B:26-2.5. Third surgical opinion If a second surgical opinion does not confirm that a proposed elective surgical procedure is medically advisable, benefits must be provided under the policy for a third surgical opinion in the same manner as for the second opinion. L.1979, c. 328, s. 4.

External source: View on Justia →

This is the verbatim text of N.J.S.A. 17B:26-2.5, retrieved from the New Jersey Legislature's public statute corpus. Statutes are amended periodically — for the most current version, check the external source link above. Kyzer is not a law firm and this page is not legal advice.

N.J.S.A. 17B:26-2.5 — Third surgical opinion | Kyzer